2024

With how little an interest in safety for investors, creators, innovators, and the rest of the ​crypto community, there is no wonder why only a 6.8% (as of May 2024) world adoption rate. ​CodeSafe is brought to you by the Ethereal Nodez ecosystem, to utilize its mission statement of ​increasing that adoption rate for the purpose of self regulating, and keeping this space for us by ​us. The ideal review system for the decentralization of cryptography should be monotized via ​the proper tokenomics. Making a profit off of regulating ourselves in this space instead of ​taxing us. This is the opposite of what government would do. Utilize these opposing techniques ​to help your investment go to a safe place while you invest in the system that does this.

The tokenomics are very fundimental to profitability by reviewing will cost a small amount but ​also make you a profit while selling will net others a profit and keep everyone from a loss. The ​way CodeSafe does this is with a sell tax that goes back to the community; there is a 15% sales ​tax that will go mostly to the other members insuring that even if the price dips, you retaining ​more tokens will not affect you. There is a smaller 5% buy tax due to the cost of making sure ​each review is accurate and making sure someone cannot corrupt the data. Venture Capitalists ​have a package for a deep dive which includes a private investigator.

With how little an interest in safety for investors, creators, innovators, and the rest of the ​crypto community, there is no wonder why only a 6.8% (as of May 2024) world adoption rate. ​CodeSafe is brought to you by the Ethereal Nodez ecosystem, to utilize its mission statement of ​increasing that adoption rate for the purpose of self regulating, and keeping this space for us by ​us. The ideal review system for the decentralization of cryptography should be monotized via ​the proper tokenomics. Making a profit off of regulating ourselves in this space instead of ​taxing us. This is the opposite of what government would do. Utilize these opposing techniques ​to help your investment go to a safe place while you invest in the system that does this.

The tokenomics are very fundimental to profitability by reviewing will cost a small amount but ​also make you a profit while selling will net others a profit and keep everyone from a loss. The ​way CodeSafe does this is with a sell tax that goes back to the community; there is a 15% sales ​tax that will go mostly to the other members insuring that even if the price dips, you retaining ​more tokens will not affect you. There is a smaller 5% buy tax due to the cost of making sure ​each review is accurate and making sure someone cannot corrupt the data. Venture Capitalists ​have a package for a deep dive which includes a private investigator.

The private investigator will go to the developers location and make sure they live at the correct ​address if you want to hire a developer or you are a VC that is deciding to back an idea that ​sounds great. Just make sure they are who they say they are. The VC package has an assigned ​rep with costs varying depending on the size of the investigation. This includes a founder doing ​a deep dive into a developer. If the person that a member writes a review on is not listed in the ​data base, it will cost a small amount extra than if you are leaving a review on someone who is ​already listed. The ability to not dox and stay anonymous leads to many more scams in crypto. ​When someone leaves a review, the rest of the users get the majority of the cost distributed

evenly divided by the amount of tokens each individual has. If you hold a large bag, and the data ​base starts catching on fire, and more members are joining the community and the bull run ​starts, you could easily see a 1000x quickly. As others sell you receive tokens as well. If you add ​liquidity, expect to see them fill up with profits. This is a “HODL” (token you will want to hold for ​an extended period of time due to one of many factors). The reason this is considered a “HODL” ​token, is due to all tokenomics are factored to make you the most money based on the length of ​time you keep it for. The longer you hold it, the more of it you will have. The more of it you will ​have, the more it will be worth. One causes the other. Gain more tokens if others sell, review, ​and gain liquidity profits the more people buy, and review. Get back tokens when others review.

The private investigator will go to the developers location and make sure they live at the correct ​address if you want to hire a developer or you are a VC that is deciding to back an idea that ​sounds great. Just make sure they are who they say they are. The VC package has an assigned ​rep with costs varying depending on the size of the investigation. This includes a founder doing ​a deep dive into a developer. If the person that a member writes a review on is not listed in the ​data base, it will cost a small amount extra than if you are leaving a review on someone who is ​already listed. The ability to not dox and stay anonymous leads to many more scams in crypto. ​When someone leaves a review, the rest of the users get the majority of the cost distributed

evenly divided by the amount of tokens each individual has. If you hold a large bag, and the data ​base starts catching on fire, and more members are joining the community and the bull run ​starts, you could easily see a 1000x quickly. As others sell you receive tokens as well. If you add ​liquidity, expect to see them fill up with profits. This is a “HODL” (token you will want to hold for ​an extended period of time due to one of many factors). The reason this is considered a “HODL” ​token, is due to all tokenomics are factored to make you the most money based on the length of ​time you keep it for. The longer you hold it, the more of it you will have. The more of it you will ​have, the more it will be worth. One causes the other. Gain more tokens if others sell, review, ​and gain liquidity profits the more people buy, and review. Get back tokens when others review.

Click on the review tab based on which tab you want to review. If it’s a developer that you had

a good experience, give him or her a 5.0 score. It will be a 0-5 point rating system, while

putting comments about your experience. We will need your public wallet address (remember,

while your public wallet address is perfectly fine to give out due to it being public info, never

give anyone your seed phrase) so we can track to make sure you are involved in a project this

person was involved with. Remember; we are trying to obtain accurate information. Getting rid ​of scammers is the goal. Not having a scammer give bad reviews to legitamate projects because ​they got caught by that project for scamming so now the developer is mad. This can happen

with any side of the business. From a user in the community, like when all users of Strong Block ​were angry with David Moss, the CEO. He developed a ponzi scheme, and David was sued ​because he was able to get away with it. The passive income token only received income when ​other buyers bought a node. He had no income attempt. He did not even try or pretend to try to ​develop a method of income. It was purely investors buying to pay old investors passive income. ​The founder of CodeSafe, Patrick Williams, turned $20,000 into $4.4 million dollars trading on ​the crypto market, and then lost all of it on Strong Block after David Moss’s project stopped ​getting new investors. It took half the time to lose all $4.4 million than it did to make it. David ​Moss received no fines, no jail time for these crimes (if he was in any other financial industry)

Click on the review tab based on which tab you want to review. If it’s a developer that you had

a good experience, give him or her a 5.0 score. It will be a 0-5 point rating system, while

putting comments about your experience. We will need your public wallet address (remember,

while your public wallet address is perfectly fine to give out due to it being public info, never

give anyone your seed phrase) so we can track to make sure you are involved in a project this

person was involved with. Remember; we are trying to obtain accurate information. Getting rid ​of scammers is the goal. Not having a scammer give bad reviews to legitamate projects because ​they got caught by that project for scamming so now the developer is mad. This can happen

with any side of the business. From a user in the community, like when all users of Strong Block ​were angry with David Moss, the CEO. He developed a ponzi scheme, and David was sued ​because he was able to get away with it. The passive income token only received income when ​other buyers bought a node. He had no income attempt. He did not even try or pretend to try to ​develop a method of income. It was purely investors buying to pay old investors passive income. ​The founder of CodeSafe, Patrick Williams, turned $20,000 into $4.4 million dollars trading on ​the crypto market, and then lost all of it on Strong Block after David Moss’s project stopped ​getting new investors. It took half the time to lose all $4.4 million than it did to make it. David ​Moss received no fines, no jail time for these crimes (if he was in any other financial industry)

Because crypto has such a lack of regulations, we need David Moss to not get into another ​project in any form. Now he is probably running another scam token because you do not

have to be doxxed. He could be running the token you hold the most in right now. ​Annonymous will be very difficult after reviews come in. No VC will want to invest in any ​annonymous projects. This will decrease scamming. It will get these people out of crypto and ​they will most likely end up in prison from scamming in another line of work. The founder of ​CodeSafe is also the founder of Ethereal Nodez, which Patrick Williams launched multiple ​times, all while protecting users funds by spending out of pocket 5x over what the users put

into the project because of developers and team members scamming. Ethereal went through

his first developer from a website, and after the launch the token went from $3 a token to ​$82 a token. Meanwhile there was a backdoor in the dApp where the developer stole ​liquidity. Ethereal pulled liquidity and hired a new developer, Patrick Meager from 5th Web. ​Mr. Meagar lied by claiming that he owned 5th Web while just being the CTO. Meager was ​contracted to build a bot 100% from scratch with a new formula, but delivered code from a ​bot he made before Patrick Williams, and Patrick Meager spoke. Mr. Meager took over ​$50,000 from Ethereal and 4 months before he told users in an illegal meeting where the ​CEO and Founder was not present, that it didn’t work. Patrick Meager and 5th Web will be

Because crypto has such a lack of regulations, we need David Moss to not get into another ​project in any form. Now he is probably running another scam token because you do not

have to be doxxed. He could be running the token you hold the most in right now. ​Annonymous will be very difficult after reviews come in. No VC will want to invest in any ​annonymous projects. This will decrease scamming. It will get these people out of crypto and ​they will most likely end up in prison from scamming in another line of work. The founder of ​CodeSafe is also the founder of Ethereal Nodez, which Patrick Williams launched multiple ​times, all while protecting users funds by spending out of pocket 5x over what the users put

into the project because of developers and team members scamming. Ethereal went through

his first developer from a website, and after the launch the token went from $3 a token to ​$82 a token. Meanwhile there was a backdoor in the dApp where the developer stole ​liquidity. Ethereal pulled liquidity and hired a new developer, Patrick Meager from 5th Web. ​Mr. Meagar lied by claiming that he owned 5th Web while just being the CTO. Meager was ​contracted to build a bot 100% from scratch with a new formula, but delivered code from a ​bot he made before Patrick Williams, and Patrick Meager spoke. Mr. Meager took over ​$50,000 from Ethereal and 4 months before he told users in an illegal meeting where the ​CEO and Founder was not present, that it didn’t work. Patrick Meager and 5th Web will be

be rated with 0 points and a long explanation on this projects data base, so no one uses him ​ever again to steal money. After this, Rogelio Vonz Santos Jr, a previously highly regarded ​developer and bio-technician was introduced to Patrick from Ethereal. Rogelio claimed he ​built other arbitrage bots and was well versed and able to build this newly designed bot. ​Rogelio not only built and delivered nothing, he stole $78k of the raise money while doing so. ​After giving back raise money of $800k to users from 5th Web and MMKK (the Telegram ​room that signed up to help Ethereal run it’s day to day activities and introduced Patrick ​Williams to Patrick Meager, because he was, in Francis Regina’s words, the best bot

developer they’ve heard of) scam run on Ethereal. Ethereal did another AMA with Web3 ​Breakfast, and Rogelio stole a good portion of that raise money along with Website ​developers, and dApp developers. The next developer worked at Google, and should not ​legally work on a project on the side. Naresh did this anyway, but he wanted to steal the ​entire project. He was introduced by someone introduced to Patrick personally, Carl Savoia. ​Between Naresh and the outside company Naresh worked with, and Carl Savoia, they took ​$98,000 and produced a product that did not function. In addition Naresh’s developers built ​a dApp that did not deliver any requests Ethereal made during construction and over charged ​signifigantly to do so. The reason was because they were paid to have the token run the dApp

be rated with 0 points and a long explanation on this projects data base, so no one uses him ​ever again to steal money. After this, Rogelio Vonz Santos Jr, a previously highly regarded ​developer and bio-technician was introduced to Patrick from Ethereal. Rogelio claimed he ​built other arbitrage bots and was well versed and able to build this newly designed bot. ​Rogelio not only built and delivered nothing, he stole $78k of the raise money while doing so. ​After giving back raise money of $800k to users from 5th Web and MMKK (the Telegram ​room that signed up to help Ethereal run it’s day to day activities and introduced Patrick ​Williams to Patrick Meager, because he was, in Francis Regina’s words, the best bot

developer they’ve heard of) scam run on Ethereal. Ethereal did another AMA with Web3 ​Breakfast, and Rogelio stole a good portion of that raise money along with Website ​developers, and dApp developers. The next developer worked at Google, and should not ​legally work on a project on the side. Naresh did this anyway, but he wanted to steal the ​entire project. He was introduced by someone introduced to Patrick personally, Carl Savoia. ​Between Naresh and the outside company Naresh worked with, and Carl Savoia, they took ​$98,000 and produced a product that did not function. In addition Naresh’s developers built ​a dApp that did not deliver any requests Ethereal made during construction and over charged ​signifigantly to do so. The reason was because they were paid to have the token run the dApp

and to ensure security. It took Ethereal Nodez new developer that is employed and loaned by ​another token (the CEO of another token referred this developer to Patrick because this CEO ​was an early user in Ethereal Nodez). Patrick Williams and Carl Schmits (CoFounder) kept ​using their own money time and time again when raise money to build all this tech dried up. ​There were other well recommended coders, and developers Ethereal Nodez went through ​before finally finding someone who was able to build what Patrick designed. This is the ​reason we needed CodeSafe. Who do you know that can build a project successfully? Who ​will keep going besides Patrick, and keep spending out of pocket? Who will claim failed ​project like David Moss? More the later than the former.

and to ensure security. It took Ethereal Nodez new developer that is employed and loaned by ​another token (the CEO of another token referred this developer to Patrick because this CEO ​was an early user in Ethereal Nodez). Patrick Williams and Carl Schmits (CoFounder) kept ​using their own money time and time again when raise money to build all this tech dried up. ​There were other well recommended coders, and developers Ethereal Nodez went through ​before finally finding someone who was able to build what Patrick designed. This is the ​reason we needed CodeSafe. Who do you know that can build a project successfully? Who ​will keep going besides Patrick, and keep spending out of pocket? Who will claim failed ​project like David Moss? More the later than the former.